- News Home
6 March 2014 1:04 pm ,
Vol. 343 ,
Two studies show that eating a diet low in protein and high in carbohydrates is linked to a longer, healthier life, and...
Considered an icon of conservation science, researchers at World Wildlife Fund (WWF) headquarters in Washington, D.C.,...
The new atlas, which shows the distribution of important trace metals and other substances, is the first product of...
Early in April, the first of a fleet of environmental monitoring satellites will lift off from Europe's spaceport in...
Since 2000, U.S. government health research agencies have spent almost $1 billion on an effort to churn out thousands...
Magdalena Koziol, a former postdoc at Yale University, was the victim of scientific sabotage. Now, she is suing the...
Antiretroviral drugs can protect people from becoming infected by HIV. But so-called pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP...
- 6 March 2014 1:04 pm , Vol. 343 , #6175
- About Us
Cosmic Speed-Up Nabs Nobel Prize
4 October 2011 12:06 pm
Thirteen years ago, two teams of astronomers and physicists independently made the same stark discovery: Not only is the universe expanding like a vast inflating balloon, but its expansion is speeding up. At the time, many scientists expected that the gravitational pull of the galaxies ought to slow down the expansion. Today, researchers from both teams shared the Nobel Prize in physics for that dramatic observation, which has changed the conceptual landscape in cosmology, astronomy, and particle physics.
Half of the $1.45 million prize will go to Saul Perlmutter of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the University of California, Berkeley, who led the Supernova Cosmology Project. The other half will be shared by Brian Schmidt of the Australian National University in Weston Creek, who led the High-z Supernova Search Team, and Adam Riess of Johns Hopkins University and the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Maryland, who worked on High-z. "I'm really happy for them," says Yannick Mellier of the Institute for Astrophysics of Paris. "It's a huge discovery that has impact in all of physics."
Both teams traced the expansion of the universe back through time using stellar explosions called type Ia supernovae. Because all such supernovae explode with essentially the same brightness, astronomers can use them as "standard candles": They can tell how far away a supernova is by measuring its apparent brightness from Earth. They can also tell how long ago the stellar bomb went off by measuring how much its light has been stretched to longer, redder wavelengths by the expansion of space. Using different supernovae, both teams found that the expansion of the universe was accelerating. "We thought we must be making some mistake," Schmidt says. "But the mistake refused to go away."
Other evidence soon bolstered the case for the accelerating expansion and some sort of "dark energy" to power it. A few years later, measurements of the afterglow of the big bang—the so-called cosmic microwave background—indicated that 70% of the stuff in the universe had to be dark energy. Studies of clusters of galaxies show that their growth has slowed over the 14-billion-year age of the universe, as if space-stretching dark energy were impeding it.
Cosmologists, astrophysicists, and particle physicists must still explain what "dark energy" is. Much effort focuses on how the density of dark energy changes as space expands. If dark energy is an inherent part of space, the density should remain constant. If dark energy is something in space, then it should become more dilute. The question comes down to using further astronomical observations to determine whether a single parameter in the cosmological "equation of state" is exactly -1, indicating dark energy is part of space, or something like -0.93, indicating that dark energy is something in space. Currently, the value of this parameter is consistent with -1 with an uncertainty of about 10%.
Will scientists ever know what dark energy is? "That's not a sure thing," says Simon White of the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics in Garching, Germany. "The problem is that you can't prove by observations that a parameter is exactly minus one."
Each team comprised about 20 scientists. "This is another example of what a shame it is that the Nobels can't recognize teams," says Martin Rees of the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. "It sends the wrong signal." White notes that Robert Kirshner of Harvard University was the thesis adviser of Schmidt and Riess and got them started on the prizewinning project.
With reporting by Daniel Clery.