- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
White House Strikes Back at GOP Budget
21 March 2012 4:23 pm
The 2013 spending plan that Representative Paul Ryan (R-WI) has proposed is expected to be approved next week by the House of Representatives, where Republicans enjoy a majority of seats. But it seems unlikely to go any further in Congress. Still, the Obama Administration considers the conservative agenda it espouses to be enough of a threat to bring out the big guns today.
Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget Jeffrey Zients took pot shots on his blog at how Ryan, who chairs the House Budget Committee, says he would shrink the trillion-dollar federal deficit. Most of the fighting will be waged over proposed changes to the nation's tax code and funding for such megaprograms as Medicare and defense. But Zients also looked at the possible implications for federally funded research.
Zients had to make a few assumptions because, as we noted yesterday, the Republican plan doesn't allocate money for specific agencies, much less individual programs within those agencies. But assuming that a 10-year, $897-billion cut "would be distributed equally across the budget," Zients lays out this scary scenario for the research community:
Investments in science, medical research, space, and technology would be cut by more than $100 billion over the next decade. The number of new grants from NIH for promising research projects would shrink by more than 1,600 in 2014 and by over 16,000 over a decade, potentially curtailing or slowing research to fight Alzheimer's disease, cancer, and AIDS. The National Science Foundation would cut over 11,000 grants over the next decade, eliminating support for over 13,000 researchers, students, and teachers in 2014 alone.
The Department of Education would be cut by more than $115 billion over a decade. 9.6 million students would see their Pell Grants fall by more than $1000 in 2014, and, over the next decade, over one million students would lose support altogether. This would derail bipartisan education reforms and deeply undermine K-12 education and college opportunity.
Clean energy programs would be cut by 19 percent over the next decade, derailing efforts to put a million electric vehicles on the road by 2015, retrofit residential homes to save energy and consumers money, and make the commercial building sector 20 percent more efficient by 2022.