Unhappy students and faculty members at the University of California, Berkeley, are expected to jam a campus
town hall meeting this afternoon to hear the dean of the college of engineering explain why he's dismantling a model program for underrepresented minorities and women.
In
announcing the change last month,
Dean Shankar Sastry said he hopes that melding the Center for
Underrepresented Engineering Students (CUES) into a new Engineering
Student Services (ESS) office will actually strengthen the college's
efforts to promote diversity. The center’s three employees were told
last month that their contracts would not be renewed, effective 30
September.
Although the university is under severe financial pressure, engineering
officials say the reorganization is not being done for budgetary
reasons and that ESS will not be jettisoning any staff positions. Karen
Rhodes, head of marketing and communications for the engineering
college, says that the school’s “yield”—the percentage of students
deciding to enroll in the fall after being accepted in the spring—is
much lower for incoming minority engineering students than it is for the
campus as a whole. She says a study by an outside consultant also found
that many engineering students were dissatisfied with the current level
of services being offered. "We need to become friendlier and in tune
with what they want,” says Rhodes.
In addition, the school has seen a sharp decline in the overall
percentage of minorities in its entering class—from 11% in 2004 to 6%
this fall. That "alarming trend," says Rhodes, has led the college to
"rethink our approach to serving underrepresented minorities."
However, supporters fear that the needs of minority students and women
will get lost in the reshuffle. A precursor of the center was begun in
1981, and its cluster of activities—which include a summer bridge
program, undergraduate research experiences, and academic and career
counseling—have been emulated over the years by several other top
universities. CUES’s supporters say that the current statistics argue
for more, not less, emphasis on the needs of those students and that
eliminating the center as an independent entity sends a signal that the
college is diluting its commitment to broadening participation.
"I was absolutely shocked when I first heard the news," says Stanley
Prussin, a professor of nuclear engineering and a former associate dean
who oversaw CUES in the late 1990s. "It's been a model for the rest of
the campus and for the entire country. The number of underrepresented
minorities [within the college] is not what you would like it to be,
but the problems have not disappeared. If anything, the need for a more
intensive and independent approach to the problem seems to be greater
than ever."
Ryan Shelby, a doctoral
student in mechanical engineering, says that CUES was a big reason he
chose Berkeley. "I wanted to make sure I had a support system, and they
showed me how much they care. Their sole mission is to increase
diversity and minority participation in engineering. It's not just a
collection of programs; it's their entire approach." Shelby is a leader
in a
student group that is asking the dean to conduct a more thorough
review of the center's impact before making any changes.