Have an unpublished manuscript about the nature of navel fluff or a possible cure for death lying around? Now, there's a new journal where you can submit your ground-breaking, thought-provoking, or even wacky hypotheses. Hypotheses in the Life Sciences (HyLS), to be published by the University of Buckingham Press starting in September, has just been founded by a group of people previously involved in the controversial journal Medical Hypotheses. It's not just a direct competitor to that journal, the group members say. Instead, they argue, it's a replacement for a different journal that Elsevier, the publisher of Medical Hypotheses, recently killed.
HyLS 's editor is William Bains, a molecular biologist and entrepreneur with a part-time position at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Bains sat on the Editorial Advisory Board of Medical Hypotheses but left in May to protest the sacking of his friend Bruce Charlton, the journal's editor, who had published a paper denying the link between HIV and AIDS.
In 2008 and 2009, however, Bains himself edited Bioscience Hypotheses, a journal with a similar mission but a much broader scope. At the time, Medical Hypotheses had to reject so many papers that there was room for a spinoff, says Charlton. But Elsevier closed down the journal in late 2009 because it wasn't profitable.
Bains, however, felt the journal had a future. He says he tried to buy the title 'Biomedical Hypothesis' from Elsevier but that the company wasn't interested in selling. So, he set up HyLS instead.
Bains says he found a welcome home at the University of Buckingham, the United Kingdom's only private university, where Charlton is a visiting professor. The university's controversial Vice-Chancellor Terence Kealey—a passionate libertarian who, according to the Guardian, "may just be the most reactionary man in Britain"—strongly supports the new journal, Bains says. "They're not likely to cave in in the face of criticism if a paper produces controversy, like Elsevier did," adds Charlton. The University of Buckingham Press publishes five other journals.
Charlton, a reader in evolutionary psychiatry at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, sits on the editorial board of the new journal, as do two other scientists who quit Medical Hypotheses's Editorial Advisory Board recently. Charlton was fired because he refused to introduce a system of peer review to Medical Hypotheses. HyLS will have its papers reviewed by an editorial panel, not unlike the system Medical Hypotheses's new editor has now adopted. "It has a similar flavor to it," says Bains. The new journal will be online only and 'open access,' with authors paying a per-page fee and papers available for free.
Bains says he won't shun articles about politically incorrect topics such as race, as long as they are "well-argued, supported by good citations to data, and with a testable hypothesis." But he won't publish the retracted paper that cost Charlton his position at Medical Hypotheses. "I didn't think it was a very good paper," Bains says. "It wasn't very well-argued."