ScienceNOW - Up to the minute news from Science

Bitter Battle Over IPCC Chair

on 10 April 2002, 12:00 AM | | 0 Comments

Scientists from around the world will meet next week in Geneva to elect a new chair of the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) amid an uproar over who should head the organization. The stakes are high, because IPCC has proved highly influential in global change issues.

The furor stems from the U.S. State Department's decision not to renominate the current chair, Robert Watson, chief scientist for the World Bank and a top environmental adviser in President Bill Clinton's White House. Instead, the government decided to back Indian engineer and economist Rajendra Pachauri, now vice chair, who for 20 years has headed New Delhi's nonprofit Tata Energy Research Institute. He was nominated by the Indian government. U.S. officials say publicly that they want a scientist from a developing nation to take charge, although privately some admit that Watson's occasional criticism of the U.S. stance on climate change and his Clinton ties sank his renomination.

Members of IPCC will decide next week who will lead the panel, which has more than 170 members and compiles reports on global change. Watson hasn't given up his candidacy. "A lot of governments say they will support me," he says. If Watson were reelected, it would be an embarrassing defeat for both the Bush Administration and the Indian government. To avoid a divisive vote, leading delegates are floating a compromise to split the unpaid position between the two men. Watson backs the idea, but Pachauri is having none of it. "I totally reject this proposal," he says. "Two co-chairs is an unworkable concept."

Many researchers see the U.S. move to dump Watson as part of a wider campaign by industry and the White House to attack IPCC's credibility and make it easier for the U.S. government to ignore its findings. "It is scandalous," says Princeton University atmospheric scientist Michael Oppenheimer. "This is an invasion of narrow political considerations into a scientific process."

But presidential science adviser John Marburger rejects that idea. "There is no evidence of a politically driven conspiracy theory," says Marburger, who attended several meetings devoted to the IPCC election. As evidence, he cites the U.S. decision to back Susan Solomon, an atmospheric chemist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's lab in Boulder, Colorado, as co-chair of the science working group.

Related sites
IPCC home page
Watson's World Bank site
Brief biography of Pachauri
TATA Energy Research Institute home page

Email Print |
More
blog comments powered by Disqus
Sciecne magazine video portal
SciecneLive
Questions or feedback on this page? Let us know.
Home > News > ScienceNOW > April 2002 > Bitter Battle Over IPCC Chair

ScienceNOW. ISSN 1947-8062