<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>ScienceNOW</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/rss/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:news.sciencemag.org,2009-12-23:/sciencenow//7</id>
    <updated>2013-05-17T21:52:47Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Science headline news from all realms of science, 
including biology, genetics, medicine, stem cells, evolution, animals, climate change, the environment, physics, astronomy, and science policy.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 5.01</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Uptick in Whooping Cough Linked to Subpar Vaccines</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/uptick-in-whooping-cough-linked-.html" />
    <id>tag:news.sciencemag.org,2013:/sciencenow//7.26665</id>

    <published>2013-05-20T04:01:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T21:52:47Z</updated>

    <summary>Newer shots are safer, but not as effective as older ones</summary>
    <author>
        <name>No Primary Author</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Medicine" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
    Whooping cough, or pertussis, has exploded in the United States in recent years. A new study confirms what scientists have suspected for some time: The
    return of the disease is caused by the introduction of new, safer vaccines 2 decades ago. Although they have far fewer side effects, the new shots don't
    offer long-lived protection the way older vaccines do.
</p>
<p>
    Pertussis bacteria colonize the upper airways, causing a severe cough and shortness of breath that can be fatal in babies. The disease seemed to have
    mostly disappeared from the United States by the late 1970s&#8212;in fact, scientists believe, it continued to spread, undiagnosed, among adults&#8212;but over
    the past 2 decades the disease has bounced back with a vengeance, with strong outbreaks among school-aged children in 2010 and last year, when the United
    States reported 40,000 cases. Many European countries have also seen increases.
</p>
<p>
    Researchers have long suspected that new vaccines might have something to do with it. Until the 1990s, children routinely received a so-called whole-cell
    vaccine, made from pertussis bacteria, <em>Bordetella </em><em>pertussis</em>, that were killed by exposure to formalin or other chemicals. These
    vaccines were known to contain a toxin that can provoke powerful side effects. Most vaccinated infants had fever and severe pain at the injection site,
    sometimes accompanied by febrile seizures or fainting fits in which the infant turned pale, unresponsive, and "floppy."
</p>
<p>
    During the 1980s, U.S. parents successfully sued manufacturers, alleging that the whole-cell vaccine also caused long-term brain damage. A 1991 Institute
    of Medicine report concluded that this was unproven, but by then many pertussis vaccine manufacturers had withdrawn from the market, leading Congress to
    create a federal vaccine injury compensation program for families who could show a strong case for vaccine damage.
</p>
<p>
    Since then, vaccinemakers have introduced newer, "acellular" vaccines that consist of refined pertussis proteins that provide immunity against disease
    without severe side effects.
</p>
<p>
    Physicians at Kaiser Permanente of Northern California compared the protective effects of these vaccines with the old ones when included in a four-dose
    series of shots called DTP (for diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis), given to children before the age of 2. They studied children born between 1994 and 1999,
    years in which Kaiser Permanente gradually introduced the new vaccines. As a result, some children had received only the old-style shots, some only the new
    ones, and some a mixture of both. Of the 1037 children included in the main part of the study, 138 got pertussis during a massive epidemic in California in
    2010 to 2011.
</p>
<p>
    <a href="http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/doi/10.1542/peds.2012-3836">
        Children who had received only the acellular vaccine were more than 5.6 times more likely to get sick than those who received the old, whole-cell
        vaccine</a>, the team will report next month in <em>Pediatrics</em>. Those receiving one or more of each type had an intermediate risk.
</p>
<p>
    The results confirm other recent research. In August, a study published in <em>The Journal of the American Medical Association</em> found
    <a href="http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1273011">
        that acellular vaccine-vaccinated children in Australia were six times more likely to get sick than those receiving the old vaccine</a>. And a study of another California population, published online in March by <em>Clinical Infectious Diseases</em>, showed an
    <a href="http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/56/9/1248.abstract?sid=aa6071df-b7c1-4609-9c8c-2286a77f5e51">
        eightfold increased risk of illness associated with the new vaccine</a>.
</p>
<p>
    "We're now finding out that the acellular vaccine's doesn't offer protection for as long," says the first author of the new study, pediatrician Nicola
    Klein. "It does work well in the short term. But there was definitely a tradeoff in phasing out the whole-cell vaccine."
</p>
<p>
    Whole-cell vaccines, still the standard of care in many lower-income countries, provide more lasting immunity in part because they consist of many more
    antigens&#8212;the proteins that trigger the immune system&#8212;than acellular vaccines, current versions of which contain three to five antigens, says James
    Cherry, a pediatrician at the University of California, Los Angeles. There is also some evidence, he adds, that pertussis strains have mutated in response
    to vaccination campaigns, rendering antibodies less effective.
</p>
<p>
    Pertussis experts have held two international meetings in the past several months to consider what to do about the waning immunity issue. Cherry thinks
    that we'd be better off with the old vaccine, but he concedes that there's no going back. "It had to go," says pediatrician Scott Halperin of Dalhousie
    University in Halifax, Canada. "It's a vaccine that would not be accepted in the societies we have in North America and Europe."
</p>
<p>
    "As much pertussis as we're seeing now, we're still seeing in most places pretty good control in the very young," who are at the highest risk of dying form
    pertussis, Halperin says. "We're seeing lapsed immunity in school-age kids and we have to solve that. But those kids aren't dying."
</p>
<p>
    Instead, most pertussis experts say what's needed is a new generation of vaccines that provide longer-lasting immunity&#8212;but that may take at least a
    decade. "The scientific community back in the 1990s felt that it had pertussis solved," Halperin says. "We're now seeing that we don't have a solution
    yet."
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>When Did Humans Begin Hurling Spears?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/when-did-humans-begin-hurling-sp.html" />
    <id>tag:news.sciencemag.org,2013:/sciencenow//7.26664</id>

    <published>2013-05-17T21:55:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T21:57:11Z</updated>

    <summary>New hunting technique allowed killing at a safe distance</summary>
    <author>
        <name>No Primary Author</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Anthropology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
    Archaeologists have long debated when early humans began hurling stone-tipped spears and darts at large prey. By throwing a spear, instead of thrusting it,
    humans could hunt buffalo and other dangerous game from a safe distance, with less risk of a goring or mauling. But direct evidence of this hunting
    technique in early sites has been lacking. A new study of impact marks on the bones of ancient prey shows that such sophisticated killing techniques go
    back at least 90,000 years ago in Africa and offers a new method of determining how prehistoric hunters made their kills.
</p>
<p>
    Other researchers have used indirect methods to study the use of projectiles, such as analyzing impact fractures on ancient stone points or identifying
    traces left by hafting on the points. Such evidence suggests that early humans created throwing spears as early as 500,000 years ago in Africa. But that
    kind of evidence leaves room for doubt and is frequently disputed.
</p>
<p>
    Archaeologist Corey O'Driscoll of South East Archaeology in Canberra became interested in the traces left by hurled spears after reading studies of the
    wounds that medieval weapons inflicted on humans. In preliminary work, European archaeologists had fired reproductions of Upper Paleolithic points made of
    antler at the carcasses of oxen and deer, then studied the marks that they left on the bones. But many archaeologists remained unconvinced by the findings,
    seeing little clear difference between projectile marks and <a href="editor-content.html?cs=UTF-8" name="_GoBack"></a>cut marks from butchering. O'Driscoll decided to build on these studies
    for his undergraduate honors thesis.
</p>
<p>
    He and a colleague knapped flint reproductions of spear and arrow points from the Middle Stone Age in Africa and attached them to wooden shafts. With a
    group of University of Queensland students, he ran 15 experiments, throwing replica spears and firing replica arrows with bows or a calibrated crossbow at
    lamb and cow carcasses. After boiling the carcasses or burying them for rapid defleshing by microbes and insects, O'Driscoll found 758 wounds on the bones,
    which he examined microscopically, and compared to 201 cut marks in an experimentally created reference collection of butchered animal bones.
</p>
<p>
    He found "quite a difference between the butchering marks and projectile impact marks," he says. His study revealed six types of distinctive projectile
    impact wounds, from drag marks to fracture marks and punctures. O'Driscoll also noted that most projectile impact marks were located on vertebrae or rib
    bones and that 17% percent of the marks overall&#8212;and 50% of the punctures&#8212;held microscopic bits of embedded stone from the flint points, due to the
    high velocity of impact. By contrast, none of the butchering marks contained such stone fragments, another key distinction.
</p>
<p>
    These findings prompted O'Driscoll and the University of Queensland's Jessica Thompson to take a new look at three bone specimens from large unidentified
    mammals&#8212;a rib and two vertebrae&#8212;from Pinnacle Point Cave in South Africa. Thompson had earlier detected embedded stone fragments in marks on these
    bones. Using O'Driscoll's diagnostic criteria, the pair identified projectile impact marks on all three bones. Two dated to between 91,000 and 98,000 years
ago&#8212;making them the oldest direct evidence of the use of projectile weapons, according to a    <a href="http://www.saa.org/Portals/0/SAA/Meetings/2013%20Abstracts/M-P.pdf">paper</a> presented at the Society for American Archaeology meeting in
    Honolulu in April. (O'Driscoll's thesis will be published by the Australian Archaeological Association in June.) A third bone dated even earlier, between
    153,000 and 174,000 years ago.
</p>
<p>
    "This is great work," says Curtis Marean of Arizona State University, Tempe, noting that the projectile impact marks, "have a clear and recognizable
    morphology."
</p>
<p>
    Archaeologist Tiina Manne at the University of Queensland also finds the identification of projectile impact marks&#8212;at least on the two later bones&#8212;highly persuasive. "This strongly suggests that projectile technology at Pinnacle Point was in use by at least 90 to 95,000 years ago," she says. But she's
    less convinced by the evidence on the oldest bone, noting that only a "single grain" of stone from the projectile point was embedded in the bone.
</p>
<p>
    Despite this reservation, Manne says that these "exciting" findings can help researchers recognize projectile impact marks on bone in many times and
    places. They have "incredibly wide-ranging applicability and the potential to further our understanding of when this technology was adopted elsewhere."
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Top Stories: A Shocking Way to Improve Math Skills, Kepler Malfunctions, and More</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/top-stories-a-shocking-way-to-im.html" />
    <id>tag:news.sciencemag.org,2013:/sciencenow//7.26663</id>

    <published>2013-05-17T20:55:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T20:57:14Z</updated>

    <summary>Some of our favorite stories of the week</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Meghna Sachdev</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Scientific Community" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
    <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/trouble-with-math-maybe-you-shou.html?ref=hp">
        Trouble With Math? Maybe You Should Get Your Brain Zapped
    </a>
</p>
<p>
    Do you pull out your iPhone to calculate the tip at the end of every meal? You're not alone&#8212;20% of adults struggle with basic math. A quick zap to the
    brain might be the answer. A study shows that applying gentle electric stimulation to the brain can boost math skills for up to 6 months. But don't go
    strapping a battery to your head just yet&#8212;researchers don't fully understand how it works, and there could be side effects.
</p>
<p>
    <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/scienceshot-diarrhea-deaths-deco.html?ref=hp">Diarrhea Deaths Decoded</a>
</p>
<p>
    Researchers have isolated the four microbes responsible for causing diarrhea, which kills 800,000 kids in the developing world each year. The biggest
surprise was the discovery of a parasite called <em>Cryptosporidium</em> as one of the culprits. Compared with the other three microbes,    <em>Cryptosporidium</em> is understudied, and scientists are hoping to speed up research into how to protect against it. In the meantime, a vaccine against
one of the other major diarrhea-causing microbes, rotavirus,    <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2013/05/rotavirus-vaccine-ready-for-roll.html">is ready for rollout in India</a>, where scientists are
    hopeful that it will help save lives.
</p>
<p>
    <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/rising-numbers-may-not-be-enough.html?ref=hp">
        Rising Numbers May Not Be Enough to Save Tigers and Kiwis
    </a>
</p>
<p>
    When it comes to threatened animals, increasing their numbers seems like a happy ending. Not quite, researchers say. A population increase is all very
    well, but if animal populations experience a loss of genetic diversity, they might be doomed anyway. A lack of genetic diversity can leave a species
    vulnerable to diseases or threats like a change in climate, because they don't have the evolutionary resources that they need to cope. Researchers are
    calling this discovery a conservation "red flag" and have identified two species clearly at risk from genetic isolation: the Bengal tiger and the little
    spotted kiwi.
</p>
<p>
    <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2013/05/malfunction-could-mark-the-end-o.html">
        Malfunction Could Mark the End of NASA's Kepler Mission
    </a>
</p>
<p>
    After 4 years of faithful service, a reaction wheel malfunction may have scuppered the planet-hunting Kepler spacecraft for good. Kepler is one of NASA's
    most successful missions&#8212;it has discovered more than 2700 possible planets and completed its original 3.5-year mission and then some. But this
    malfunction has left the craft unable to point in a specific direction, a pretty important skill for a planet-hunter. NASA engineers have put the craft in
    safe mode and are looking for solutions, but it looks like it may soon be lights out for Kepler.
</p>
<p>
    <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2013/05/us-supreme-court-upholds-monsant.html">
        U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Monsanto Soybean Patents, Rejects Blame-the-Bean Defense
    </a>
</p>
<p>
    Agribusiness giant Monsanto has won a long-running case against an Indiana farmer who refused to pay royalties on unlabeled beans that he'd bought
    containing Monsanto-patented genes. The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the company's patents cover not just genetically engineered seeds
    distributed by Monsanto itself, but also any seeds in the environment that contain Monsanto's genes.
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>ScienceShot: Fungi Provide an Early Warning System for Plants</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/scienceshot-fungi-provide-an-ear.html" />
    <id>tag:news.sciencemag.org,2013:/sciencenow//7.26662</id>

    <published>2013-05-17T16:20:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T16:28:21Z</updated>

    <summary>Fungus alerts plants to aphid attack</summary>
    <author>
        <name>No Primary Author</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Botany" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Ecology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Entomology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
    The deal between plants and soil fungi is well known. The fungus takes soluble carbohydrates such as sugars from the plant's roots, while the plant makes
    use of extra soil minerals absorbed by the extensive surface area of the fungal mat or mycelium. Now, it appears that the plant gets something extra in the
    bargain. When a bean plant (<em>Vicia faba</em>) is infested with aphids, it produces a cocktail of chemicals that repels the insects but attracts a natural
    aphid predator, the wasp (inset).
    <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.12115/abstract">
        Even bean plants not attacked by aphids produce these chemical defenses&#8212;as long as they are connected to the besieged plants via a fungal mat&#8212;</a>a team reports online this month in <em>Ecology Letters</em>. The researchers don't know exactly how the danger is communicated but the possibility of
    aboveground signaling was ruled out: The plants were covered with bags. The most likely mechanism, they say, is chemical communication by means of the
    fungal network. The roots of many important food crops including wheat, rice, and maize exist cheek by jowl with symbiotic fungi, and this has major
    implications for green pest control of the aphid (main picture). Strategically placed plants throughout the crop would trigger the chemical response for the benefit of
    the other plants. Altruistic? Yes, but a few plants sacrificed for the health of the whole field makes economic sense in the war against this agricultural
    enemy. <br /></p><p><i>See more </i><a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/scienceshots/">Science<i>Shots</i></a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>ScienceShot: Easy Hiking, and Biking, on Titan</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/scienceshot-easy-hiking-and-biki.html" />
    <id>tag:news.sciencemag.org,2013:/sciencenow//7.26661</id>

    <published>2013-05-16T21:30:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-16T21:31:29Z</updated>

    <summary>First global topographic map of Saturn&apos;s big moon shows a subdued landscape
</summary>
    <author>
        <name>No Primary Author</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Astronomy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Planetary Science" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
    Titan has the perfect name: With a diameter of 5150 kilometers, not only is it Saturn's largest moon but it also surpasses Mercury and Pluto.
    Unfortunately, Titan's atmosphere is thicker than ours and contains orange haze that shrouds its surface (inset). Now, the Cassini spacecraft, orbiting
Saturn, has used radar to measure the moon's heights and depths. In the July issue of the journal <em>Icarus</em>, planetary scientists present    <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103513001620">the first global topographic map of the distant world</a>. In the main image,
    north is up and south is down; red and orange represent Titan's highest altitudes, blue and green its lowest. Whereas Earth's tallest mountain towers
    nearly 9 kilometers above sea level, Titan's topographic variations are mild: Its highest point is just half a kilometer above the mean and its lowest just
    1.7 kilometers below, perhaps because Titan's crust isn't strong enough to support tall mountains or because its thick atmosphere unleashes methane rains
    that erode them away.</p><p><i>See more </i><a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/scienceshots/">Science<i>Shots</i></a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Podcast: Apes, Monkeys, Kiwis, and Tigers. Oh My!  </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/podcast-apes-monkeys-kiwis-and-t.html" />
    <id>tag:news.sciencemag.org,2013:/sciencenow//7.26657</id>

    <published>2013-05-16T21:05:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T15:13:58Z</updated>

    <summary>Listen to a roundup of some of our favorite stories from the week

</summary>
    <author>
        <name>No Primary Author</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Podcast" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Scientific Community" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/">
        <![CDATA[ 
<p>
What are we learning about the evolutionary split between <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/new-fossils-provide-earliest-gli.html?ref=hp">apes and monkeys</a>? Why are    <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/rising-numbers-may-not-be-enough.html?ref=hp">little spotted kiwis and Bengal tigers</a> still in
trouble despite their recovering numbers? And why is chopping down trees bad for    <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/study-of-controversial-dam-revea.html?ref=hp">hydropower</a>?
</p>
<p>
    <a href="http://podcasts.aaas.org/science_podcast/SciencePodcast_130517.mp3"><em>Listen to the full </em>Science<em> podcast.</em></a>
</p>

<p>
    <a href="http://podcasts.aaas.org/science_news/transcript/ScienceNOWPodcast_130517.pdf"><em>Read the transcript.</em></a>
</p>
<p>
    <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/cgi-bin/mt/mt-search.cgi?IncludeBlogs=5%2C8%2C7&amp;limit=20&amp;search=podcast&amp;src=hw">
        <em>Hear more podcasts.</em>
    </a>

</p>
]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>ScienceShot: A Future Baby&apos;s Revealing First Photos</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/scienceshot-a-future-babys-revea.html" />
    <id>tag:news.sciencemag.org,2013:/sciencenow//7.26658</id>

    <published>2013-05-16T21:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-16T21:01:11Z</updated>

    <summary>Technique could improve success rates of IVF
</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Gretchen Vogel</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Cell Biology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Medicine" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
    Time-lapse imaging of embryos growing in the clinic can increase the chances of identifying those most likely to develop into a successful pregnancy,
    according to a new study. When couples use in vitro fertilization (IVF) to conceive, more than one embryo often results, and doctors have to choose which
ones to implant in the mother. Researchers have now developed a method that uses    <a href="http://www.carefertility.com/care-fertility-sc0/time-lapse-embryo-imaging-sj31/">time-lapse photography</a> to more accurately observe how long an
    embryo takes to develop from fertilization to the hollow ball of cells called a blastocyst (pictured) about 5 days later. Embryos that take longer are more
    likely to carry chromosomal abnormalities that lead to miscarriage. In a paper published today in <em>Reproductive BioMedicine Online</em>, the team
    reports that
    <a href="http://www.rbmojournal.com/article/S1472-6483(13)00238-1/abstract">
        embryos that scored low risk on their evaluation scale had a 61% chance of resulting in a live birth, compared with a 19% chance for medium-risk
        embryos</a>. No embryos in the high-risk category produced a pregnancy. The technique is noninvasive and much less expensive than current genetic screening methods,
    which require removing a few cells from the blastocyst.</p><p><i>See more </i><a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/scienceshots/">Science<i>Shots</i></a>.
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>ScienceShot: Chalk + Glass = Beauty</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/scienceshot-chalk-glass-beauty.html" />
    <id>tag:news.sciencemag.org,2013:/sciencenow//7.26660</id>

    <published>2013-05-16T19:51:38Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T15:34:52Z</updated>

    <summary>Scientists discover simple set of design rules for creating complex shapes</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Robert F. Service</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Materials Science" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/">
        <![CDATA[  <!-- START SLIDER -->
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/css/anythingslider2.css" media="screen"> 

<script src="http://www.sciencemag.org/site/multimedia/components/slider/jquery.anythingslider.js" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"></script>		
    
    <script type="text/javascript"> 
    
        function formatText(index, panel) {
		  return index + "";
	    }
    
        $(function () {
        
            $('.anythingSlider').anythingSlider({
                easing: "swing",        		// Anything other than "linear" or "swing" requires the easing plugin
                autoPlay: false,                // This turns off the entire FUNCTIONALY, not just if it starts running or not.
                delay: 3000,                    // How long between slide transitions in AutoPlay mode
                startStopped: false,            // If autoPlay is on, this can force it to start stopped
                animationTime: 600,             // How long the slide transition takes
                hashTags: true,                 // Should links change the hashtag in the URL?
                buildNavigation: true,          // If true, builds and list of anchor links to link to each slide
        		pauseOnHover: true,             // If true, and autoPlay is enabled, the show will pause on hover
        		startText: "Go",             	// Start text
		        stopText: "Stop",               // Stop text
		        navigationFormatter: formatText // Details at the top of the file on this use (advanced use)
            });
            
            $("#slide-jump").click(function(){
                $('.anythingSlider').anythingSlider(6);
            });
            
        });
    </script> 
       
    <div class="bd"> 
		
		
			<div class="anythingSlider"> 
			<div class="wrapper"> 
			<ul> 
                
<li> 
					<div class="panel-inner"> 
						<img src="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/slideshows/minerals5.13/min-3.jpg" alt="" class="oline" /> 					
						<div class="image-credit">Credit: Image courtesy of Wim Noorduin</div>
                        <div class="">
							<p><strong>Microbouquet.</strong>  The "flowers" in this false-color SEM image were grown by nucleating the growth of green stems within purple vases and then changing growth conditions to open the stems into petals (blue).</p>
						</div>
					</div>                
                </li> 

				<li> 
					<div class="panel-inner"> 
						<img src="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/slideshows/minerals5.13/min-2.jpg" alt="" class="oline" /> 					
						<div class="image-credit">Credit: Image courtesy of Wim Noorduin</div>
                        <div class="">
							<p><strong>Combo flower</strong>. These "flowers" are made by first growing the corallike structure at the bottom (red), then nucleating green spirals within the coral&#8217;s folds. Finally, a pulse of added CO2 causes the spirals to flare out into petals (purple).</p>
						</div>
					</div>                
                </li> 

				<li> 
					<div class="panel-inner"> 
						<img src="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/slideshows/minerals5.13/min-1.jpg" alt="" class="oline" /> 					
						<div class="image-credit">Credit: Image courtesy of Wim Noorduin</div>
                        <div class="">
							<p> <strong>Rose by another name</strong>. Changing the conditions of how glass and chalk grow allowed the formation of complex coral shapes atop a spiral, creating what looks like a rose in this false color SEM image.</p>
						</div>
					</div>                
                </li> 

				<li> 
					<div class="panel-inner"> 
						<img src="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/slideshows/minerals5.13/min-4.jpg" alt="" class="oline" /> 					
						<div class="image-credit">Credit: Image courtesy of Wim Noorduin</div>
                        <div class="">
							<p><strong>Instant forest</strong>. Exposing an aqueous solution containing barium chloride and waterglass (sodium silicate) to CO2 in the air creates a landscape of microscopic "flowers." </p>
						</div>
					</div>                
                </li> 				
                		
			</ul> 
			</div> 
			</div> 			
		</div> 
		<!--  END SLIDER -->

<p>
Over the years, materials researchers have managed to assemble a handful of simple shapes, such as rods, spheres, and tetrapods, by growing materials from the bottom up an atom at a time. But the ability to grow complex shapes on demand has been limited. Now, scientists have discovered a simple set of design rules for controlling how two different materials&#8212;basically chalk and glass&#8212;assemble together. Turn the knobs of a solution&#8217;s pH, temperature, or the amount of CO2 present and you can alter the way the material grows, changing, for example, from a spiral that resembles a stem, to what looks like a leaf, or even a blooming flower. By turning those dials at just the right time, the researchers grew a variety of luscious-looking blooms that resemble tulips, crocuses, and roses. Discovering similar design rules for magnetic, metallic, and electronic materials, the researchers say, may allow them to pattern catalytic materials and electronic devices over entire surfaces&#8212;for making things like cheap solar cells&#8212;by simply controlling the conditions under which they are grown.
</p>

<p><i>See more </i><a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/scienceshots/">Science<i>Shots</i></a>.
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Trouble With Math? Maybe You Should Get Your Brain Zapped</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/trouble-with-math-maybe-you-shou.html" />
    <id>tag:news.sciencemag.org,2013:/sciencenow//7.26656</id>

    <published>2013-05-16T18:35:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-17T15:47:39Z</updated>

    <summary>Study shows that electrical brain stimulation speeds mathematical learning 
</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Emily Underwood</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Computers, Mathematics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Neuroscience" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
    If you are one of the 20% of healthy adults who struggle with basic arithmetic, simple tasks like splitting the dinner bill can be excruciating. Now, a new
    study suggests that a gentle, painless electrical current applied to the brain can boost math performance for up to 6 months. Researchers don't fully
    understand how it works, however, and there could be side effects.
</p>
<p>
    The idea of using electrical current to alter brain activity is nothing new&#8212;electroshock therapy, which induces seizures for therapeutic effect, is
    probably the best known and most dramatic example. In recent years, however, a slew of studies has shown that much milder electrical stimulation applied to
    targeted regions of the brain can dramatically accelerate learning in a wide range of tasks, from marksmanship to speech rehabilitation after stroke.
</p>
<p>
    In 2010, cognitive neuroscientist Roi Cohen Kadosh of the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom showed that, when combined with training,
    <a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2010/11/brain-zaps-improve-math.html">
        electrical brain stimulation can make people better at very basic numerical tasks</a>, such as judging which of two quantities is larger. However, it wasn't clear how those basic numerical skills would translate to real-world math ability.
</p>
<p>
    To answer that question, Cohen Kadosh recruited 25 volunteers to practice math while receiving either real or "sham" brain stimulation. Two sponge-covered
    electrodes, fixed to either side of the forehead with a stretchy athletic band, targeted an area of the prefrontal cortex considered key to arithmetic
    processing, says Jacqueline Thompson, a Ph.D. student in Cohen Kadosh's lab and a co-author on the study. The electrical current slowly ramped up to about
    1 milliamp&#8212;a tiny fraction of the voltage of an AA battery&#8212;then randomly fluctuated between high and low values. For the sham group, the researchers
    simulated the initial sensation of the increase by releasing a small amount of current, then turned it off.
</p>
<p>
    For roughly 20 minutes per day over 5 days, the participants memorized arbitrary mathematical "facts," such as 4#10 = 23, then performed a more
    sophisticated task requiring multiple steps of arithmetic, also based on memorized symbols. A squiggle, for example, might mean "add 2," or "subtract 1."
    This is the first time that brain stimulation has been applied to improving such complex math skills, says neuroethicist Peter Reiner of the University of
    British Columbia, Vancouver, in Canada, who wasn't involved in the research.
</p>
<p>
    The researchers also used a brain imaging technique called near-infrared spectroscopy to measure how efficiently the participants' brains were working as
    they performed the tasks.
</p>
<p>
    Although the two groups performed at the same level on the first day, over the next 4 days people receiving brain stimulation along with training learned
    to do the tasks <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.045">two to five times faster than people receiving a sham treatment</a>, the authors
    report online today in <em>Current Biology</em>. Six months later, the researchers called the participants back and found that people who had received
    brain stimulation were still roughly 30% faster at the same types of mathematical challenges. The targeted brain region also showed more efficient
    activity, Thompson says.
</p>
<p>
    The fact that only participants who received electrical stimulation and practiced math showed lasting physiological changes in their brains suggests that
    experience is required to seal in the effects of stimulation, says Michael Weisend, a neuroscientist at the Mind Research Network in Albuquerque, New
    Mexico, who wasn't involved with the study. That's valuable information for people who hope to get benefits from stimulation alone, he says. "It's not
    going to be a magic bullet."
</p>
<p>
    Although it's not clear how the technique works, Thompson says, one hypothesis is that the current helps synchronize neuron firing, enabling the brain to
    work more efficiently. Scientists also don't know if negative or unintended effects might result. Although no side effects of brain stimulation have yet
    been reported, "it's impossible to say with any certainty" that there aren't any, Thompson says.
</p>
<p>
    "Math is only one of dozens of skills in which this could be used," Reiner says, adding that it's "not unreasonable" to imagine that this and similar
    stimulation techniques could replace the use of pills for cognitive enhancement.
</p>
<p>
    In the future, the researchers hope to include groups that often struggle with math, such as people with neurodegenerative disorders and a condition called
    developmental dyscalculia. As long as further testing shows that the technique is safe and effective, children in schools could also receive brain
    stimulation along with their lessons, Thompson says. But there's "a long way to go," before the method is ready for schools, she says. In the meantime, she
    adds, "We strongly caution you not to try this at home, no matter how tempted you may be to slap a battery on your kid's head."
</p>

]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Atlantic Coast Warping Like a &apos;Magic Carpet&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/atlantic-coast-warping-like-a-ma.html" />
    <id>tag:news.sciencemag.org,2013:/sciencenow//7.26655</id>

    <published>2013-05-16T18:20:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-16T18:21:00Z</updated>

    <summary>Discovery may change how geologists reconstruct past climate
 </summary>
    <author>
        <name>No Primary Author</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Environment, Climate" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Geochemistry, Geophysics" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
    Compared with western North America&#8212;mountainous, volcanic, and earthquake-prone&#8212;the geologically quiescent East Coast has earned the appellation
    "passive continental margin." But new geologic models show that Earth's churning interior warps and bends this and many other so-called stable areas.
</p>
<p>
    Three million years ago, Earth was several degrees warmer than it is today&#8212;about the same global temperature that we may see by the year 2100.
    Geologists want to know what continental shorelines looked like during this ancient era, known as the Pliocene, in order to forecast future sea-level
    change. Scientists assumed that passive continental margins, like the Atlantic coastal plain and offshore sea floor, have no geologic forces pushing them
    up. The coast instead slowly and relentlessly sinks as the rock beneath it cools and sand and mud washed off the land fill the space created by the sinking
    continental margin. Without anything pushing the rocks up, the ancient coastlines studied by geologists should remain flat and horizontal, marking the
    level that the sea once came to. But one of these old beaches, the Pliocene-era Orangeburg Scarp, warps and bends along its course from Florida to North
    Carolina.
</p>
<p>
    What if something is pushing the land up? David Rowley, a geologist at the University of Chicago in Illinois, and a team of geodynamical modelers simulated
    the lava lamp-like movement of hot material in Earth's mantle, which is a highly viscous though solid layer of rock between the crust and the molten core.
    Hot mantle plumes rising up from the core can affect Earth's surface, creating Yellowstone's steaming geysers and Hawaii's spectacular volcanoes.
</p>
<p>
    Rowley's team uncovered <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/science.1229180">subtle mantle movements under eastern North America</a> by
    including in their model a layer of relatively soupy rock, just beneath Earth's rigid outer shell, called the asthenosphere. It allows the outer shell to
    slip across the underlying mantle, Rowley says.
</p>
<p>
    A model that doesn't consider the asthenosphere would show the Orangeburg Scarp sinking. "But clearly, the Orangeburg Scarp is going up," Rowley says. It
    bows and bends "like a magic carpet." Rowley says he's modeled similar effects, dubbed "dynamic topography," in Africa and in the Colorado Plateau of the
    American southwest. "The whole Earth is riding on a dynamic mantle," he says.
</p>
<p>
    A dynamic mantle may have so distorted passive margins that researchers have been misreading the record of sea-level changes during the Pliocene era and
    seen them as more dramatic than they were. That may cause climate modelers to rethink future sea-level rise under a warming climate. Dynamic topography
    doesn't change global sea levels, but moves the "low-water marks" that are used to measure Earth's past climate.
</p>
<p>
    Dynamic topography means that the Atlantic coast can't really be considered a passive margin anymore. "It's really a passive-aggressive margin," says
    Kenneth Miller, a geologist at Rutgers University in Piscataway, New Jersey, who was not involved in the study. "They give us a mechanism for the
    aggression." Rowley's modeling work needs to be checked against the geologic record, Miller says. He believes that the current large-scale model needs to
    be refined to better match the surface geology. At the current resolution of hundreds of kilometers, he says, "it's not really testable."
</p>
<p>
    Paleontologist Harry Dowsett of the U.S. Geological Survey in Reston, Virginia, who was also not involved in the study, says that he sees evidence of
    Rowley's model in the distribution of surface rock outcrops. "It's such an excellent fit to the geology. It explains what we see," he says.
</p>
<p>
    Better estimates of Pliocene sea levels will help geologists know how much of the ice sheets melted during that balmy era, Dowsett says, which may give us
    a glimpse of our own climate future.
</p>
<p>
    "It doesn't make my job any easier," jokes Dowsett, who uses microscopic fossils to reconstruct Pliocene shorelines. "Probably made it a lot harder."
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>ScienceShot: Invasive Ladybug Carries Fatal Parasite</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/scienceshot-invasive-ladybug-car.html" />
    <id>tag:news.sciencemag.org,2013:/sciencenow//7.26654</id>

    <published>2013-05-16T18:05:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-16T16:03:15Z</updated>

    <summary>Infectious fungus key to beetle&#8217;s success
</summary>
    <author>
        <name>No Primary Author</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Ecology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Entomology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Microbiology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
    The innocuous-looking harlequin ladybird (<em>Harmonia axyridis</em>, shown left) wields a biological weapon of mass destruction. Europe and North America
    imported the insects in the early 20th century to control pesky aphids. But the harlequin, native to Asia, began to flourish, crowding out the native
    seven-spotted ladybug (<em>Coccinella septempunctata</em>, shown inset). Scientists previously thought that the harlequin prospered because of an
    unusually strong antimicrobial immune system, which would protect it from disease in a foreign environment. But the beetle's more potent secret is a fungal
    parasite, in the insect-afflicting <em>Nosema</em> genus, which lives in the beetle's blood.
    <a href="http://www.sciencemag.org/content/340/6134/862.abstract">
        The parasite doesn't affect the harlequin but fatally overwhelms seven-spotted lady beetles within 2 weeks</a> of infection, researchers report online today in <em>Science</em>. Ladybugs commonly eat the eggs of competing species, so when seven-spotted beetles feast
    on the harlequin's parasite-laden eggs, the parasite strikes back. Researchers say that foreign invaders fare better when they bring along diseases that
    they're already tolerant of, while other, closely related species (such as the seven-spotted ladybug) might not enjoy such conquistador-like success. <br /></p><p><i>See more </i><a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/scienceshots/">Science<i>Shots</i></a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>ScienceShot: Stinky Feet Smell Sweet to Malaria-Infected Mosquitoes </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/scienceshot-stinky-feet-smell-sw.html" />
    <id>tag:news.sciencemag.org,2013:/sciencenow//7.26648</id>

    <published>2013-05-15T21:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-15T20:30:44Z</updated>

    <summary>Insects three times more likely to be drawn to the human odor than their uninfected counterparts
</summary>
    <author>
        <name>No Primary Author</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Entomology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
    To the malaria-carrying mosquito <em>Anopheles gambiae </em>(pictured), the stench of human feet is like the smell of a fresh-baked pie. A team of
    entomologists set out to see if the bugs were even more drawn to the odor when infected with the malaria parasite. Lead researcher and entomologist Renate
    Smallegange collected the smell using her own feet&#8212;with a nylon stocking that she wore for about 20 hours. She and her colleagues then exposed the
    stocking to caged mosquitoes, allowing them to land on it and poke it with their proboscises in a vain attempt to feed. It turned out that
    <a href="http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063602">
        malaria-infected mosquitoes are about three times more likely to be attracted to the smell of human feet
    
     than their uninfected counterparts</a>, the researchers report today in <em>PLOS ONE</em>. But the stink of human body odor comes from a soup of many chemicals, making it hard to tell just
    which odor the mosquitoes love. So the team plans to attach tiny electrodes to mosquito antennae, which they use to smell, and test them against individual
    body chemicals. They hope their findings will help scientists build better traps in the wild that will draw only infected mosquitoes. <br /></p><p><i>See more </i><a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/scienceshots/">Science<i>Shots</i></a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>ScienceShot: Zipping Around Uranus and Neptune</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/scienceshot-zipping-around-uranu.html" />
    <id>tag:news.sciencemag.org,2013:/sciencenow//7.26645</id>

    <published>2013-05-15T21:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-15T21:01:24Z</updated>

    <summary>The two giant worlds have only shallow winds
</summary>
    <author>
        <name>No Primary Author</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Planetary Science" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
    Although billions of kilometers distant, Uranus (left) and Neptune (right) sport something a terrestrial airline pilot would appreciate: souped-up jet
    streams that can clock in at more than 1000 kilometers an hour. The two worlds are twin planets, with nearly identical sizes, masses, and compositions.
    Each is an "ice giant" dominated by a large core of ice, rock, and iron inside a thick atmosphere of hydrogen and helium, which methane gas tinges green
    and blue. Both worlds have east-to-west jet streams at their equators and west-to-east jet streams at high latitudes; the winds ferry material through the
    atmospheres and thereby subtly affect the planets' gravitational fields. Now, as researchers report online today in <em>Nature</em>, those fields reveal
    that
    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12131">
        the jet streams extend no farther than 1100 kilometers beneath the cloud tops&#8212;just a fraction of each planet's size</a>, because the equatorial diameters of Uranus and Neptune are respectively 51,118 and 49,528 kilometers. Many stars host worlds this large, so the finding
    may have implications for adventurous pilots skirting through the friendly skies of alien solar systems. <br /></p><p><i>See more </i><a href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/scienceshots/">Science<i>Shots</i></a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Study of Controversial Dam Reveals Hidden Dependence on Rainforest</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/study-of-controversial-dam-revea.html" />
    <id>tag:news.sciencemag.org,2013:/sciencenow//7.26650</id>

    <published>2013-05-15T17:30:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-16T17:32:10Z</updated>

    <summary>Deforestation in Amazon reduces electricity from hydropower dams by up to 40%
</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Erik Stokstad</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Ecology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Environment, Climate" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
    Hydropower dams may be an unlikely new weapon for conservationists trying to save tropical trees. A new study reveals that vast forests are necessary to
    keep rivers flowing and turbines spinning. Without them, the dams produce significantly less power than they would otherwise. "The idea that protecting
    tropical forest is necessary for sustainable hydropower is a new argument," says Kathryn Hochstetler of the Balsillie School of International Affairs and
    the University of Waterloo in Canada. The findings could encourage forest conservation, she says, but they might also encourage construction of dams that
    are more damaging to the local environment.
</p>
<p>
    Brazil generates about 80% of its electricity from dams, and the government is planning a lot more. For example, when engineers complete the $14 billion
    Belo Monte Dam on the Xingu River in Para state, it will have the third greatest capacity for generating hydropower in the world. But opponents of the dam
    worry about its environmental impacts, including harm to fishes and flooding of land for its reservoir. The original design called for five reservoirs that
    would have destroyed 1225 km² of forest. Because of objections, the design was changed to a single reservoir of 441 square kilometers.
</p>
<p>
    The common wisdom among engineers, however, is that deforestation isn't necessarily bad for hydropower. As long as erosion doesn't silt up the reservoir,
    cutting trees should actually improve electricity generation. That's because trees take up a lot of water from the soil and send it into the atmosphere
    through a process known as evapotranspiration. Remove the trees, the thinking goes, and the ground contains more water, which eventually trickles into
    streams and ends up swirling through the turbines in a dam downstream.
</p>
<p>
But there is a larger picture. Growing evidence suggests that    <a href="http://www.whrc.org/resources/publications/pdf/CoeetalJHydrol.09.pdf">rainforests help keep rivers flowing</a>. The massive amount of moisture
    that they send into the air&#8212;much more than from crops or pasture&#8212;creates regional weather patterns that lead to rain storms over the forest. Claudia
    Stickler, a geographer with Brazil's Amazon Environmental Research Institute (AERI), who is based in San Francisco, California, and her colleagues examined
    what deforestation would mean for the Xingu River and its potential for hydropower.
</p>
<p>
    It matters where the trees are cut, they found. Deforestation within the Xingu watershed did indeed boost river flow, by up to 12%. But according to their
climate and hydrological models, this boost is undercut by the impact of continued deforestation throughout the Amazon watershed as a whole. By 2050,    <a href="http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1215331110">the continued loss of trees will inhibit storms and slacken the Xingu's flow by up to 36%</a>, the team reports online this week in the <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</em>. That would mean 40% less power than the dam-builders
    are predicting.
</p>
<p>
    Things may not be quite that bad. The scenario for deforestation was based on data from 1995 to 2006. Since then, the rate of tree cutting has fallen 76%
    from the 10-year average and continues to decline. "This research would provide one more reason to redouble those efforts and try to prevent backtracking,"
    Hochstetler says. The authors say the results are widely applicable. "Clearly there's potential that [the results are] relevant for other tributaries for
    which hydropower dams are being planned," says co-author Daniel Nepstad of AERI.
</p>
<p>
    The worry is that the prospect of less reliable hydropower will mean that engineers will be more likely to design large reservoirs to guarantee water
    pressure for electricity generation. Wilson Cabral de Sousa Júnior, an environmental economics specialist at the Technological Institute of Aeronautics in São José dos Campos, Brazil,
    points out that it would be legally simple for the government to decide to add more reservoirs to the Xingu River.
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Fossils May Pinpoint Critical Split Between Apes and Monkeys</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2013/05/new-fossils-provide-earliest-gli.html" />
    <id>tag:news.sciencemag.org,2013:/sciencenow//7.26639</id>

    <published>2013-05-15T17:20:00Z</published>
    <updated>2013-05-15T17:20:34Z</updated>

    <summary>Key evolutionary event eventually gave rise to human beings</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Michael Balter</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Anthropology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Evolution" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Paleontology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/">
        <![CDATA[<p>
    From the human perspective, few events in evolution were more momentous than the split among primates that led to apes (large, tailless primates such as
    today's gorillas, chimpanzees, and humans) and Old World monkeys (which today include baboons and macaques). DNA studies of living primates have estimated
    that the rift took place between 25 million and 30 million years ago, but the earliest known fossils of both groups date no earlier than 20 million years
    ago. Now, a team working in Tanzania has found teeth and partial jaws from what it thinks are 25-million-year-old ancestors of both groups. If the
    interpretations hold up, the finds would reconcile the molecular and fossil evidence and possibly provide insights into what led to the split in the first
    place.
</p>
<p>
    Researchers have long been frustrated by a paucity of fossils from this key period in evolution, which sits at the borderline between two major geological
    epochs: the Miocene (about 23 million to 5 million years ago) and the Oligocene (about 34 million to 23 million years ago). The earliest known fossils of
    early apes and Old World monkeys date from the early Miocene and have been found in just a handful of sites in Kenya, Uganda, and North Africa. Meanwhile,
    molecular studies of existing primates consistently suggest that these two groups arose during the Oligocene, leading scientists to wonder whether the
    molecular dates are wrong or if paleontologists have been looking in the wrong places.
</p>
<p>
    For more than a decade, researchers from the United States and Tanzania have been combing Tanzania's Rukwa Rift Basin, searching for fossils of all kinds.
    During the 2011 and 2012 seasons, a team led by Nancy Stevens, a vertebrate paleontologist at Ohio University in Athens, discovered fossils that it
    identified as belonging to two previously unknown species of primates: one, an apparent ape ancestor the team has named <em>Rukwapithecus fleaglei</em>;
    the other, a claimed Old World monkey ancestor dubbed <em>Nsungwepithecus gunnelli</em>. (The species were named after two notable primatologists, John
    Fleagle of Stony Brook University in New York, and Gregg Gunnell, who is now at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina.)
</p>
<p>
    Both specimens, consisting of teeth and partial jaws, were found in Rukwa Rift sediments dated by several techniques, including the often used argon-argon
    method, to 25.2 million years ago. The team identified them as ape and Old World monkey ancestors from the features of their molars, which paleontologists
routinely use to tell primates apart. For example, Stevens says, <em>Nsungwepithecus</em> "has a much more triangular outline" of its last lower molar than    <em>Rukwapithecus</em>, and there are "a number of other major differences in the shape and position of the cusps and crests that run along the chewing
surface of the teeth."    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12161">The two species also show other dental features that group them with later Old World monkeys and apes</a>,
    but are still different enough to be classified as separate&#8212;and more ancient&#8212;species.
</p>
<p>
    The team, which reports its discoveries online today in <em>Nature</em>, points out that the split between early apes and Old World monkeys took place
    during a time of dramatic environmental, climatic, and tectonic changes in East Africa. Indeed, the Oligocene-Miocene boundary was marked by numerous
    tumultuous geological events, including a collision between the land masses that make up Africa and Arabia on one side and Europe and other parts of Asia
    on the other. However, just why those changes led the two groups to split "is one of the mysteries we would like to solve" by further research, Stevens
    says, although she thinks that it could be related to changes in the kinds of food resources available to the primates.
</p>
<p>
    Michael Steiper, an anthropological geneticist at Hunter College in New York City who has conducted numerous molecular studies of primate evolution,
    welcomes the new findings. "At long last they reconcile the fossil and molecular records of early apes and monkeys," he says.
</p>
<p>
    And Fleagle, after whom one of the species was named, calls the discoveries "a wonderful story of perseverance" over many years of research. As for the
    team's claims to have found the earliest known ape and Old World monkey ancestors, he says that "their identifications are as good as they can be with the
    material in hand." The "real split" between the groups could have taken place even earlier, he says.
</p>
<p>
    But Terry Harrison, an anthropologist at New York University in New York City, cautions that the team's claims could be wrong. "Despite the seductiveness
    of the conclusions, I'm skeptical about the interpretations," he says. Harrison thinks that <em>Rukwapithecus</em>, the claimed ape ancestor, could
    represent a primate that actually predates the ape-monkey split and that the dental features used to identify it as an ape are "questionable"; and he
    argues that <em>Nsungwepithecus</em> might not even be a primate, but rather a suiform artiodactyl, a piglike, hoofed animal. "Similar cases of mistaken
    identity have occurred in the past," Harrison says, including claims for Miocene primates in East Africa that turned out to be artiodactyls and other
    nonprimates.
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
