- News Home
27 November 2013 12:59 pm ,
Vol. 342 ,
The new head of the National Center for Science Education promises to "fight the good fight" against attacks on...
Analyses of the H7N9 strains isolated from four new cases show that the virus is evolving rapidly, heightening anxiety...
In 2009, Jack Szostak shared a Nobel Prize for his part in discovering the role of telomeres, the end bits of...
Science has exposed a thriving academic black market in China involving shady agencies, corrupt scientists, and...
Paper-selling agencies flourish in the aura of reputable businesses. For some scientists, it may be difficult to tell...
Featuring the first lunar rover in 40 years, Chang'e-3 is seen as an important milestone on China's quest to send a...
Data collected by satellites and floating probes have chronicled a 2-decade rise in the temperature and thickness of a...
Cholesterol, the artery-clogging molecule that contributes to cardiovascular disease, has another nasty trick up its...
- 27 November 2013 12:59 pm , Vol. 342 , #6162
- About Us
Dispute Over a Legendary Fish
30 March 1999 7:00 pm
Thought to have gone extinct 80 million years ago, the coelacanth pulled off a miraculous revival when a fisher caught one off South Africa in 1938. Another extraordinary chapter in the saga was written last year, when a second population of the big ugly fish turned up some 10,000 kilometers away in Indonesia. Now the coelacanth story has taken a nasty turn: The Indonesian variety's discoverer has accused another researcher of a "dishonorable act of scientific piracy" for a report, appearing in a French journal next month, that calls the Indonesian coelacanth a new species and gives it a name.
No one thought the living fossil survived anywhere else in the world except off southeast Africa until Mark Erdmann, a biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, tracked down a coelacanth in Indonesia last summer. After taking tissue samples, Erdmann donated the fish to the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) in Cibinong. He claims LIPI had agreed that a team at the University of Texas (UT), Austin, would be the first to publish an analysis of the fish's DNA, after which the LIPI scientists could name the new species--if that's what the Indonesian coelacanth turned out to be.
Shortly thereafter, LIPI scientists got geneticist Laurent Pouyaud of the French Institute for Development Research (IRD) in Jakarta to help them with their own analysis. Pouyaud submitted a report to Nature last January, just days after the UT group's analysis arrived at the journal. In February Nature rejected the paper from Pouyaud, who then offered a revised version to the French Academy of Sciences' Comptes Rendus de L'Académie de Sciences, which published the report in its April issue.
Based on an analysis of two swatches of mitochondrial DNA, Pouyaud and his group report that the Indonesian coelacanths diverged from their African cousin, Latimeria chalumnae, between 1.2 million and 1.5 million years ago. The genetic and morphological distinctions between the two populations are great enough to merit classifying the Indonesian coelacanth as a new species, they conclude, naming it L. menadoensis, after the volcanic island, Manado Tua, where the fish was found. The UT group's analysis, still under review at Nature, puts the divergence much earlier, around 5 million to 7 million years ago.
Erdmann says he is outraged that Pouyaud stands to get the lion's share of credit for naming the species. "All this guy did was stick some meat in a sequencer," he says. He adds that he would not have complained if the Indonesians had named the fish. Pouyaud calls Erdmann's distress sour grapes. "Two scientific research teams were competing," he says. "At the end, little David beat Goliath." Pouyaud's employer is squarely behind him. "We know nothing about any agreement between Dr. Erdmann and the rightful owners of the specimen" at LIPI, says IRD's Patrice Cayre. "LIPI has every right to do whatever it wants with the specimen."