- News Home
17 April 2014 12:48 pm ,
Vol. 344 ,
Officials last week revealed that the U.S. contribution to ITER could cost $3.9 billion by 2034—roughly four times the...
An experimental hepatitis B drug that looked safe in animal trials tragically killed five of 15 patients in 1993. Now,...
Using the two high-quality genomes that exist for Neandertals and Denisovans, researchers find clues to gene activity...
A new report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concludes that humanity has done little to slow...
Astronomers have discovered an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf—a star cooler than the sun—500...
Three years ago, Jennifer Francis of Rutgers University proposed that a warming Arctic was altering the behavior of the...
- 17 April 2014 12:48 pm , Vol. 344 , #6181
- About Us
Lord of the Wings
14 May 2008 (All day)
The dragonfly is an aerial acrobat. It's able to fly fast and slow, backward and forward, and even stay aloft while copulating. Where does the energy for all of these stunts come from? A new report in today's issue of the Journal of the Royal Society Interface suggests that the answer has to do with the insect's four independently moving wings.
Most flying insects use only a single pair of wings. Some, like butterflies and bees, use two pairs but synchronize their motion so that the effect is akin to having just two wings. Dragonflies and damselflies stand apart: Unusual musculature allows them to move each of their four wings independently. Computer modeling has shown that such out-of-phase flapping comes at a cost, however, reducing the amount of lift the insect is able to generate.
To see if these computer models hold up in the tangible world, James Usherwood, a biologist at the Royal Veterinary College in London, and Fritz-Olaf Lehmann, a biologist at the University of Ulm in Germany, built a robotic version of a dragonfly. They immersed the robot in mineral oil seeded with air bubbles to allow them to visualize the movement of the fluid around the flapping wings. Sensors at the base of the robot's wings recorded lift and drag forces, which allowed the team to calculate its aerodynamic efficiency.
Flapping four wings actually achieved lift with more efficiency than flapping just two wings. When the robot's hind wings flapped one-quarter of a wing beat ahead of the front wings, the team reports, the hind wings were able to capture the rush of air sent by the front wings and produce lift with 22% less power than two-winged insects require. Flapping in phase has benefits, too: When real dragonflies synchronize their wing beats, they are able to lift off and accelerate better than if they used only two wings or four out-of-sync wings, the authors say. Engineers may be able to apply these findings to building the next generation of flapping micro air vehicles, says Lehmann.
Jane Wang, a mathematician at Cornell University, says that the data agree with her own computer models of hovering dragonflies and that the new study elucidates why out-of-phase flapping is so efficient. Richard Bomphrey, a biologist at the University of Oxford in the U.K., cautions that scientists need to validate the findings in living insects. Still, he agrees that the research could ultimately aid engineers. The main difficulty facing the designers of micro air vehicles is that battery life limits how long the devices stay aloft, he says, so "any tips or tricks which enhance aerodynamic efficiency will be warmly welcomed."