- News Home
6 March 2014 1:04 pm ,
Vol. 343 ,
Antiretroviral drugs can protect people from becoming infected by HIV. But so-called pre-exposure prophylaxis, or PrEP...
Two studies show that eating a diet low in protein and high in carbohydrates is linked to a longer, healthier life, and...
Considered an icon of conservation science, researchers at World Wildlife Fund (WWF) headquarters in Washington, D.C.,...
The new atlas, which shows the distribution of important trace metals and other substances, is the first product of...
Early in April, the first of a fleet of environmental monitoring satellites will lift off from Europe's spaceport in...
Since 2000, U.S. government health research agencies have spent almost $1 billion on an effort to churn out thousands...
Magdalena Koziol, a former postdoc at Yale University, was the victim of scientific sabotage. Now, she is suing the...
- 6 March 2014 1:04 pm , Vol. 343 , #6175
- About Us
Russia's Auditors Censure Effort to Support Nanotechnology
12 August 2010 11:16 am
Russian government auditors say that a disbanded government agency for research and innovation misspent about $16 million in 2008–09 on nanotechnology projects that were "unnecessary and were duplicating other contracts."
A report published Tuesday by the Russian Federation Accounts Chamber, a body which audits the federal budget, criticizes the practices of Rosnauka, created in 2004 by the Ministry of Education and Science to implement state science policy and manage state-owned property related to science, R&D, and innovation. It also commissioned federal programs and projects to research institutions. Part of a larger ministerial restructuring, it was suspended earlier this year by President Dmitry Medvedev and its functions were handed back to the ministry.
The money was used to promote Russia's nanotech industry. About $6.5 million went to an online national nanotechnology network, which the auditors say duplicates a digital scientific library and Russian citation index base. Rosnauka also spent about $1 million on information, analysis, and monitoring of the program's implementation, which the chamber says should not have been outsourced.
The audit does not reflect the government's nanotech research program, which is managed by a corporation called Rusnano. "We always make it clear that the Rosnauka activities are absolutely separate from those of Rusnano," says a corporation spokesperson. At the same time, this year Rusnano was reproached by the Chamber for spending a large proportion of its budget on its own infrastructure before awarding grants to any nanotech R&D projects.
This is not the first time Rosnauka was accused of inappropriate use of the federal money. A year ago, an Accounts Chamber report flagged $6.7 million in improper spending, including $5.6 million to the same nanoindustry development program. The chamber said funding that should have gone to research was used to pay for consulting and management services relating to various exhibitions.
The report will be sent to the ministry, the cabinet, and the parliament. But its impact is unclear, given that Rosnauka no longer exists.
*This item has been corrected. It originally stated that Rusnano was previously reproached by the Chamber last year. It was reproached this year.